Design Beyond the “Happy Spray”| A Conversation with John Maeda

We had a conversation with John Maeda as a part of our interviews for the Design Lens. After serving as the 16th President of the Rhode Island School of Design, Maeda is currently the design partner at the Silicon Valley-based venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers. We talked about his new role as well as the connections between design, technology, and business.

Maeda explains his role in Kleiner Perkins as “to help more people see beyond design as a kind of a spray, a happy spray: ‘Oh design! It’s great!'” “I’m very uninterested in beauty or aesthetics” he says. “I care more about the ecosystem and the kind of systems thinking that’ll create better startups.” He exemplifies from Silicon Valley:

“I think it’s important to know that [Y Combinator] is an example of design. It’s probably the biggest example of design in the Silicon Valley ecosystem. Because they designed how to create more startups. It’s a very elegant design. […] So I see YC’s strength as the design of the organization and the construct.”

However he admits that his mission of shifting perspectives about design will take some time: “If it involves people, it’s going to take more time than you expect.” He goes on to explain:

“Maybe 90% [of Silicon Valley design] or over is graphic, interactive on the screen. From a diversity perspective, it’s not very good. Because you want all kinds of design. So a lot of what I’m interested in doing is that I keep focusing on growing the diversity of how we talk about design and finding more connections between design and technology and business.”

He says that the task involves a lot of “leadership development” as it requires company leaders that understand his frame: “Letting people see that the technology is important. But the technology isn’t the only important thing. And, when you pull design closer to it, you create a better product.”

He explains:

“It used to be technology and design could be separate in the computer industry. It was easier that way. But now to design for a smaller screen, to design for lower power, engineering is getting harder. Constraints are higher. So design has to be close to it to have a better effect.”

Then, he expands on the dynamics that have driven design forward:

“If you rewind history before computers design was always important. Like when you were buying a car, you wouldn’t buy it for the technology. You’d buy it for the design. When computers came along, we didn’t care about the design, we cared about the technology. Because the technology was differentiated, highly differentiated. But over time, everyone can have a good computer.”

So, according to Maeda, design isn’t rising in importance, but technology’s ability to differentiate is falling:

“Design has always been there. Design always differentiates. But in the digital technology era, it wasn’t doing that. But now, it is.”

Image Credit: Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s